Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/خراج بارد


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted, a10 of Cold abscess. Nominator as said below please note that not being in English is not itself a criteria for deletion Jac 16888  Talk 22:57, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

خراج بارد

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not English  Biplab Anand  ( Talk with me ) 16:02, 17 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete, of course. LjL (talk) 16:12, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete A10 of cold abscess. clpo13(talk) 16:25, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - This is the second time in two days when an article gets wrongly nominated by cyberpower Chat:Limited Access for an AfD, when it should NOT.
 * This article is candidate for speedy deletion WP:A10 for the reason stated in the talk page: "Article is completely taken out from Wikipedia's article: Cold abscess, roughly translated into Arabic, and reposted as an original article!".  MarkYabloko '''  16:37, 17 November 2015 (UTC)


 * NOTE Not being in English is not grounds for a deletion discussion. The procedure for this is at WP:PNT. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:00, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Of course not—Largo Plazo (talk)! But you haven't noticed the note saying that this article is ALREADY in Wikipedia; it was copied from Wikipedia cold abscess and translated to Arabic!  MarkYabloko '''  18:43, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Really, I didn't notice it? Are you psychic? Yes, I noticed it. And I agree with it. I didn't mention it because it wasn't relevant to my comment about the initiation of this discussion. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:49, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm sure the deletion discussion can proceed anyway (or even skip straight to a speedy delete) despite the initiation not being technically 100% proper, because WP:NOTBURO. LjL (talk) 18:57, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * This discussion has no bearing on a speedy deletion. The speedy deletion tag that's already on the page will take care of that. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:45, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Go on, be more pedantically WP:BUROcratic. LjL (talk) 20:43, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry that you think that making someone aware of something the he appears not to have known so that he knows not to keep doing it is pedantic. Hooray for the preservation of ignorance! —Largo Plazo (talk) 22:18, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I can't even figure out which thing I said you actually think is either pedantic or bureaucratic. Is it the part where I told the nominator something he didn't know so he would know not to do it again, or is it the part where I pointed out to a person who chided me for something that his chiding was off-point, or is it the part where I corrected the misunderstanding of the person (you) who thought that this discussion has some bearing on the speedy deletion so he would realize that it doesn't? If you're going to troll, can you at least be clear what you're trolling about? Or would it then no longer be trolling, and therefore less fun for you? —Largo Plazo (talk) 22:24, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) You could have informed the nominator on their talk page since it has "no bearing" (to use your words) on this deletion discussion per se; 2) you don't seem aware that this discussion can very well have bearing on an admin's decision to speedily delete because, since WP:NOTBURO, an admin can most certainly take the arguments made here for speedy deletion into account, whether or not it's the "right place"; 3) I am aware of technicalities such as !votes, just decided not to be pedantic about it, while I'm not sure you're well aware of things like WP:NPA given your claim of "trolling" and now-deleted claims of "ignorance". Now when you're done causing edit conflicts with machine-gun edits, perhaps I can post this LjL (talk) 22:28, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * In this sort of case it made sense to point it out here so that less experienced people who learn by example and might therefore have deduced from this AFD that, hey, it's correct to submit non-English articles directly to Afd, would know that that isn't the correct approach. As for personal attacks, please look back to see who, out of the blue, unprovoked, attacked whom (calling me pedantically bureaucratic in his very first communication with me). —Largo Plazo (talk) 22:45, 17 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete Article appears to have been posted at the Arabic Wikipedia. Adam9007 (talk) 22:14, 17 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.