Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/سئویل موغانلی


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:SNOW delete. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 18:34, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

سئویل موغانلی

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article has gone untranslated for two weeks now. In addition, it doesn't seem like an effort is being made to translate it. Therefore, it's time to delete.  Event horizon51  (talk) 17:34, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as obviously not in English - I'm surprised it can't be Speedied (A2 doesn't work unless it exists on another WP) ... Personally I don't see the point in sending it to WP:Pages needing translation into English but if someone really wants to send it there I have no objections. – Davey 2010 Talk 17:45, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * It has in fact been sent to WP:PNT but there has been no effort at all to translate.  Event horizon51  (talk) 17:49, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah I wasn't aware of that so thanks, In that case we won't send it there . – Davey 2010 Talk 18:16, 14 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete, has been listed at WP:PNT for two weeks without translation now (prod would have been fine for this by the way)-- Jac 16888 Talk 18:00, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I chose the AfD process for this article in the hope that an administrator can come along and close this discussion early and deal with the article sooner. The PROD process requires seven days to expire and make an article eligible for deletion.  Event horizon51  (talk) 18:19, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Is there some reason this article needs deleted now rather than in 7 days? Colapeninsula (talk) 10:05, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
 * This article has already had its two week opportunity for someone working on it to translate it. The PROD process would only instate an unnecessary extension of this time to three weeks. I was actually hoping to get a speedy deletion criterion in place for these types of articles with this thread, but it doesn't seem like it will achieve consensus.  Event horizon51  (talk) 15:30, 15 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete for obvious reasons Shad Innet (talk) 06:30, 15 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.