Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/عائلة ابوبكر


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   already deleted. Bearian (talk) 18:01, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

عائلة ابوبكر

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

doesn't seem to meet wp:n for several reasons uncited and seems to be in concern to a family or organization this article failed to meet csd A2  Staffwaterboy Critique Me Guestbook Hate Comments  07:44, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * *Wait it out Since we don't have a legitimate translation to judge this article by, we should wait for two weeks, per policy, for a translation. If none is available, then the article should be deleted. Wiki policy states: If the article is not rewritten in English within the next two weeks it will be listed for deletion and/or moved to the Arabic Wikipedia. Also, please note families can be notable. We just don't know which family this article is referring to. Anti  venin  08:07, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete After reading Google's translation of this page I believe this article describes the history of a certain Arabic family (complete with migrations and descendants) that is not encyclopedic and is not verifiable. For these reasons this article should be deleted. Anti  venin  08:20, 4 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: per Anti   -- Oliver  Twisted (Talk) (Stuff)  08:23, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete no sign of notability - "AbuBaker Family Group on facebook has pictures of some of this family members." Radiant chains (talk) 08:24, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Though in this case you are correct, lack of sources does not usually rule out notability. Anti  venin  08:33, 4 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The machine translation of the text is hard to understand, but it sure looks like a listing of the family genealogy with no assertion of notability. Delete. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  17:32, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. While Abu Bakr is undeniably notable, that's no reason to devote an entire article to his family tree all the way to modern times. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 22:40, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't have time to read the whole thing, but I think that if there were a claim of notability, it would be in the first couple of sentences. Instead, we find that the Abu Bakr family of Hijaz is related to the Abu Ghosh family of Jerusalem, the Al-Hut family of Egypt and the Al-Batina family of Jordan. Ordinarily, I think this would be disposed of by speedy deletion, but I don't want to make that call without reading the entire article. --Cbdorsett (talk) 06:06, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.