Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/قرى وادي الصعاليك


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Not translated in a timely manner. Request at WP:REFUND if you are interested in translating the material. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 06:21, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

قرى وادي الصعاليك

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not in English. Unreferenced in the original. The original will not be verifiable. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:07, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Is not in English and therefore does not belong on English language version of Wikipedia. Circumspect (talk) 07:50, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * There is no speedy deletion provision for articles to be deleted because they aren't in English. The procedures for handling such articles are at Pages needing translation into English. Largoplazo (talk) 11:58, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep for now and let the normal process at WP:PNT for pages not in English run its course. Having no references isn't grounds for deletion; the solution is to add them. As for the original not being verifiable, I don't see why an article about a portion of Qilwah Province in the Al Bahah Region of Saudi Arabia would be unverifiable. Largoplazo (talk) 12:06, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:56, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:56, 9 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Procedural keep !Vote on hold . Try again after the WP:PNT grace period is over, i.e. after 21 January. And why will the original not be verifiable? Just because you cannot read it? --HyperGaruda (talk) 15:30, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Procedural Keep sounds like the correct thing to do. I personally have not seen an article like this show up at AFD before. -- do  ncr  am  06:22, 11 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment I suggest a relist of this AFD (instead of closing it). 21 Jan is like 8 days. If someone can improve then well and good. Otherwise, we can delete this. There is no point in closing this AFD and starting another in 8 days. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:31, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Agree with Lemongirl here, provided that the AfD is extended to 28 January, i.e. 14 days post-PNT listing + 7 days of PROD/AfD. --HyperGaruda (talk) 06:16, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 07:22, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete simply for not being in English and being an unlikely seearch term for an English reader. Ajf773 (talk) 09:04, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Not being in English is actually not a reason for deletion, it's a reason for Page Translation.Procedural Keep and Close.--Yellow Diamond Δ Direct Line to the Diamonds  02:45, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Treat as WP:WRONGFORUM and reopen any time if there are issues with the translated version. NasssaNser (talk/edits) 12:47, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Time's up for this PNT entry, which has still not been translated into English. --HyperGaruda (talk) 06:19, 21 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.