Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ถ้าคุณแน่? อย่าแพ้ ป.4!


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete for the reasons given in the nomination. Bearian 16:38, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

ถ้าคุณแน่? อย่าแพ้ ป.4!

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This doesn't seem notable enough for inclusion in the English language version of Wikipedia unless all foreign-language game show adaptations are automatically notable, which I don't believe to be the case. Also has non-Latin alphabet title, that at least should be changed if the decision is to keep. Dougie WII 17:50, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete or change title to english. Either avenue is a great improvement to wikipedia. Decoratrix 18:15, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This show is noted in the adaptations section of Are you smarter than a 5th grader so I see no real need to repeat the gameplay for every foreign language version unless there are any significant changes (although in fairness, the Thai version does actually appear to be in better shape than the main article). Tx17777 20:03, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as there are plenty of articles with foreign versions of random TV shows, but move to English title. Stifle (talk) 20:43, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFF - if this article said anything different to what is described on the page for Are you smarter than a 5th grader, for example significant differences in rules or format then it might be worthy of being kept. This article does not, it is nothing more than a description of a localized remake. I suppose it could be worthwile to rename to to an english title and put in a redirect, but to keep it is just unnecessary repetition of information Tx17777 21:14, 8 November 2007 (UTC)


 * redirect/delete no-one is going to put this in the search bar of the english wikipedia, I wouldn't even know how to do it in this alphabet. Would belong in a country more local too it's wikipedia, where people might actually search in that language, not on the english wikipedia.Merkinsmum 23:16, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Okay, author is NOT smarter than a fifth grader when it comes to making a title for an article. Written in Thai for no apparent reason other than "just because I can"; a fifth grader would know that the English speakers who might read this just don't have those keys on their computer keyboard.   Or that the kids who would look at it would ask, how do you pronounce it?  Cute, but dumb.  Good article, however.  I suggest a move to "Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader? (Thailand version)"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mandsford (talk • contribs) 01:18, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete (although a translation of the non-English titles should probably be put into the article on the show). With the exception of the students being in the 4th grade rather than the 5th, which may easily be a cosmetic difference only, there's nothing sufficiently noteworthy about this show by itself to warrant a separate article from the general franchise of "Are you smarter than a 5th grader". See, for example, another internationally successful gameshow, where the only versions to have their own articles are ones with visible differences from the original concept, despite there being a different version for many different markets. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 05:12, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per BigHaz. The Thai edition of Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader? doesn't sound all that different from the U.S. and other international editions of the show; there's no need for a separate article about it. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 09:10, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge to US quiz show, which appears to have been widely franchised. Peterkingiron 00:27, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.