Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/“magic box”


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 14:14, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

“magic box”

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No evidence of significance or notability. Unsourced; primary purpose appears to be to link to other article by same author: ProjectEmily. JNW (talk) 19:54, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete this is almost nonsense. Tavix (talk) 22:51, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Tavix is being too nice--this makes no sense at all. The two sentences about Wittgenstein are correct, and that's the nicest thing that can be said for this unreferenced piece of work. Drmies (talk) 00:42, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and opinions stated above. Yanksox (talk) 14:28, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CB. Stifle (talk) 12:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.