Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/‡biblios.net


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. – Juliancolton  | Talk 01:30, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

‡biblios.net

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

nn website. Eolld (talk) 23:18, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep because it does "...describe the nature, appearance or services a website offers..." -- The New  Mikemoral  ♪♫ 23:59, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge to LibLime. ‡biblios.net has been covered by Library Journal and Information Today, Inc.. I believe it has also been discussed in Library & Information Update, the news magazine of CILIP, and I shall try to find the specific article(s) later. I think these are the sort of publications that one would reasonably expect to cover cataloguing software, and even if there's not currently enough information available to merit an independent article, ‡biblios.net should certainly be discussed as part of the company's article. EALacey (talk) 05:46, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - The 3 links provided by EALacey show this website is notable. &mdash; LinguistAtLarge • Talk  05:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  00:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems to be a major open source project; sufficient references to it. DGG (talk) 17:08, 27 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.