Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/也是醉了


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 17:47, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

也是醉了

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

What I really want to know is which WP:CSD criterion this meets. This article is obviously not suitable for an encyclopedia nor does it make any credible claim of significance.  Event horizon51  (talk) 04:54, 9 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Slowly delete. There is no CSD criterion for this article. --Sammy1339 (talk) 05:00, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * You'd think there would be, but in reality the criterion that comes closest to this is A11 as it's a randomly coined Chinese phrase that makes no credible claim of significance. However, to most people this wouldn't be "obvious" enough.  Event horizon51  (talk) 05:09, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 05:35, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 05:35, 9 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:GNG and WP:WORDISSUBJECT. I can find about 25 books that use the phrase, but none that discuss it. It might be suitable for Wiktionary. Cnilep (talk) 08:19, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTDICT. This article is about a Chinese internet slang and nothing else. Cnilep might find use for its literal meaning ("I am also drunk", which is easily commonplace) but no notability would be established for that case. Also Baidu Baike is not RS anyway.  野狼院 ひさし  Hisashi Yarouin 13:33, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * delete, entirely inappropriate for WP.-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 00:26, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Snow delete since we can't speedy it. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 03:14, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.