Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/猫 シ Corp.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deleting! Thanks everyone for your participation and assuming good faith. Missvain (talk) 23:53, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

猫 シ Corp.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Makes good music but fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG with zero third-party coverage, and article sourcing reflects such. sixty nine  • whaddya want? •  19:46, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:53, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:53, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Move to Cat Corp. or another appropriate name in the Roman alphabet. The current name violates the naming convention Naming conventions (use English). --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:42, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 20:19, 15 January 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: One more round here folks out of an attempt to garner more eyes.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 18:12, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing to establish (or even claim) notability. It also smacks of marketing-speak (which could be fixed). ··· 日本穣 ·  投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 18:24, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TNT, WP:COAT, WP:MILL, WP:SPAM and WP:GNG. A brief look by any reader could see this is a mess. The name of the article is not in the Roman alphabet. It's a run-on essay that would take hours to fix into an article. It's clear that it's not about some notable corporation, but some dude, a rando on the Internet. Spam in 2007 could not excused, but in 2020 we can't assume good faith when we see this very obvious spam. Bearian (talk) 17:19, 27 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.