Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/--;

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete. Carried out at 08:16, 6 Jan 2005 by User:RickK. Closing the discussion. Rossami (talk) 04:30, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

--;
Neo-something: what's the word that means "a newly coined symbol"? Neograph? This is supposed to be the internet symbol for "hammer." Is there one for a trashcan yet? -Cmprince 05:26, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Yes, the trashcan \_/


 * Neomoticon. Delete. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 05:34, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete as probable spam. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 05:36, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete Appears to be spam/advertising, not notable site, not encyclopedic. - Amgine 06:12, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, \_/ Wyss 06:56, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC). Wyss 06:56, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * delete ~ mlk &#9993; &#9836; 07:07, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC) ~
 * Delete, spam/vanity James F. (talk) 07:35, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * d is a symbol meaning Delete -- Ferkelparade &pi; 10:28, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * If you're thinking about saying "Delete --;", then don't bother. It won't be original or funny, but there's always someone. Delete. - Vague | Rant 11:30, Dec 30, 2004 (UTC)
 * ->\_/ is a symbol meaning delete. Neo-something. Andrewa 12:24, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete the symbol is a neomoticon, the article is an advert. Rje 15:37, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Very cute, Andrew. Yes,  -> \_/  this.  GRider\talk 18:25, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Cast it into oblivion. Delete Phils 21:47, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Hit it with a hammer. Maybe enough like nonsense to be a speedy candidate. David Johnson [ T|C ] 01:21, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

\ --; /  ¯¯¯¯¯ --BesigedB (talk) 18:52, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * wow youguys take yourselves WAY too seriously. --; forever
 * Agree we take ourselves way too seriously. On the other hand, IMO you aren't taking our project nearly seriously enough. Please sign your posts here with ~, it makes it easier for all of us to lighten up. No change of vote. Andrewa 19:50, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * A definite keeper. What's wrong with it? -- User:fuscob 13:11 EST 12/31/04 fake signature by User:69.172.1.249
 * Do not delete. This is a valid Item of great importance. -mrchicken
 * Thanks for improving the article, IP 65.74.90.211, this is such a rare (and to me obvious) course of action and such a good example for others that I'm tempted to change my vote... but not quite enough. Andrewa 19:50, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * KEEP... this symbol will become important to the internet eventually! --; is a symbol meaning keep! 205.188.117.12 18:41, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC) Icey
 * \_/ - David Gerard 18:56, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable symbol. (Oops, I said the "N" word ... :-O )Elf-friend 19:31, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable. Jayjg |  (Talk)  04:16, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Pedant 22:48, 2005 Jan 4 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.