Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/-ismist Recordings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  19:23, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

-ismist Recordings

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Non-notable record label. – Miles Edgeworth Talk 15:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:44, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:44, 26 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Weak keep - important in the development of Slipknot, multiple signed notable bands indicate this label has had discernable impact on musical culture. Linked to by several articles.  A brief search for sources turned up     78.26   (spin me / revolutions) 14:36, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep there are some more sources out there, I have added a couple to the article. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 15:05, 29 October 2017 (UTC).

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:16, 2 November 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete References fails the criteria for establishing notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. Since notabilty is not inherited, the notability of Slipknot is not a reason to Keep. The startribune.com reference mentioned by is entirely based on an interview with Schlissel and is not "intellectually independent" (which is required for references that meet the criteria for establishing notability) and therefore fails WP:ORGIND and/or WP:CORPDEPTH. Similarly, the mfkr1 interview added to the article bu  fails for the same reasons.  -- HighKing ++ 16:05, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:58, 9 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.