Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/...Seishunchuu!


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — A itias  //  discussion  21:24, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

...Seishunchuu!

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Nonnotable one-shot by a nonnotable artist. Google searches on the English and kanji titles and on the author's name don't turn up anything, and neither the series nor the author have entries on Anime News Network. 「ダイノ ガイ 千 ？！」(Dinoguy1000) 20:39, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. — 「ダイノ ガイ  千 ？！」(Dinoguy1000) 20:40, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I couldn't find any reliable sources providing in depth coverage in a Google search. Also, I just want to mention that one of the sources listed in the article states that it is 2 volumes and complete, contradicting the infobox in the article which says it is 1 volume and still running. Calathan (talk) 22:29, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete ...Seishunchuu! a 2 volumes (complete) series by Kurihara Mamoru. No licensor in US/UK, France, Germany, Spain & Italy. No ANN reference. Lack of third party coverage to assert Verifiability and  Notability --KrebMarkt 08:28, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Its been published for 11 years now. When I Google for "…青春中！" I get over 200,000 results.  So I guess the term is rather commonly used.  I'd like to know what magazine it is published in, and the sales figures.   D r e a m Focus  16:24, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Is there a source that says it was published for 11 years? As I commented above, one of the sources originally in the article said it was complete, not ongoing, and that it finished at only 2 volumes long.  There hasn't been any evidence presented that suggests it actually ran for a long time.  The statement that it is ongoing is currently unsourced and seems to be incorrect. Calathan (talk) 18:56, 17 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep as per Dream Focus. RP459 (talk) 18:11, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete since no independent reliable sources have duscussed this. That something exists and can proven to exist does not put it over the notability bar.Bali ultimate (talk) 23:28, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of coverage by reliable sources. The number of WP:GHITS is irrelevant. How long ago it was originally published is also irrelevant. --Farix (Talk) 00:54, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.