Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/.22 Cheetah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 02:28, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

.22 Cheetah

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete no references, nothing to show that this product is notable. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:53, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. (Speedy?) Good faith nomination, no doubt, of a terribly underreferenced stub--miracle it wasn't speedied, perhaps. But this is the best-selling wildcat cartridge in the world, more than 4,000 fps, accurate over long range...gunlovers and varmint killers all over the world spooge over this. OK, I don't care for guns, but this product is notable--as you'll see, I hope, when you have a look at the new and improved article. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 02:36, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Article has been adequately updated.Vulture19 (talk) 02:41, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect somewhere (maybe .22, maybe List of rifle cartridges, maybe Wildcat cartridge). All mentions are passing in the article's references. Many types of ammo have separate WP pages but unless there's a special precedent here I don't see how WP:N is met nor is there enough info. at most of these pages to justify splitting for length. If no suitable rd candidate is found, I would say weak delete. JJL (talk) 03:37, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Updated, informative, precedent exists for articles covering wildcat cartridges provided they merit mention in the literature. MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:42, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. It doesn't seem particularly important, but it has been improved enough to avoid the chopping block. Quantumobserver (talk) 22:25, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to an article such as suggested above. It does not rate its own article. --Stormbay (talk) 00:03, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep -- Fairly well known wildcat, despite having a problem with eating barrels at a tender age. Could use some additional detail being added to the article, but the article is now a good start with cites.  Yaf (talk) 21:30, 17 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.