Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/.450 Bonecrusher


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 20:28, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

.450 Bonecrusher

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable firearm cartridge type. The only provided reference is an esay by the developer himself. I'm not finding any viable references that demonstrate WP:N, though the cartridge does appear in various publications of exhaustive lists of ammunition types. Mikeblas (talk) 15:47, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:26, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge to .500_Linebaugh, it's a wildcat. Appears in most reloading manuals. Supposed to replicate the performance of a .454 Casull. As with all wildcats though they are very niche and the variations are endless.--Savonneux (talk) 13:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   15:20, 24 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete...Not notable, just one of countless obscure wildcat cartridges. I can't even find a major manufacturer that has ever made a gun chambered for it. I think the only guns ever made for it were the inventors prototypes.--RAF910 (talk) 07:02, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   13:32, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete...Normally I would say merge to the parent cartridge if there is sufficient sourcing, there is not...just 1 self published ref and the article looks like it was written by a 10-year-old.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 17:39, 31 August 2015 (UTC),


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.