Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/.585 Hubel Express


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 20:14, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

.585 Hubel Express
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Seller/promoter/developer of the cartridge has indicated that the article was for advertising/promotional purposes. Please remove. Details regarding the issue are found in Talk:.700 Hubel Express. The .700 Hubel Express article should be deleted as well as it was intended as for the same purpose as the original author User:Hubel458 has indicated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeusImperator (talk • contribs) 8 September 2010
 * Note: Listing in AfD log for the first time on 20 September. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 17:48, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: Articles for deletion/.700 Hubel Express has also been listed. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 17:53, 20 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete A couple of us have made good-faith efforts to work with the original content contributor. Unfortunately, there is a WP:COI issue with that editor. We have also been unable to validate any non-trivial reliable sources to establish notability. The only info available is on forums or WP:OR and is even under constant revision for key elements such as cartridge measurements. We tried, but I think it's time to give up. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 22:39, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Having read through Talk:.700_Hubel_Express I would like to congratulate AliveFreeHappy and DeusImperator on their efforts to create a suitable article, well above and beyond normal efforts. Next time I hope you'll look for the WP:Reliable sources before going to so much effort! The article fails to assert notability through references to reliable sources, therefore it must go. Bigger digger (talk) 20:47, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant coverage. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 16:29, 27 September 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.