Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/.Sub (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:58, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

.Sub (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

A band that I don't see passing the requirements of WP:NBAND. I was unable to find any reliable sources discussing them, just personal sites such as Myspace and mirrors of this article. The only claim the article makes about media exposure is that NME mentioned them, but not only is a singular source not sufficient to pass WP:NBAND, but the reference linked to that quote in the article is to a CD seller's site, not to anything that verifies coverage in NME. Rorshacma (talk) 23:15, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I found these:, , but they're not enough to establish notability, and none of our other accepted notability criteria appear to be met. --Michig (talk) 05:43, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:03, 19 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - I cannot find the significant coverage needed to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:31, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No major label, no significant chart position, no significant sales history, no awards, no gold/platinum certification, etc, etc. Does not meet WP:MUSICBIO or WP:BAND.  Is therefore WP:NN. Яεñ99 (talk) 07:39, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.