Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/01099


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) ––FormalDude (talk)  09:24, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

01099

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I don't think it meets Wikipedia's requirements Opps Noor (talk) 20:06, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Opps Noor (talk) 20:06, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:12, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep The nominator has not given a valid reason for deletion. The sources in the article seem to establish notability, and there's nothing else obviously wrong with it. Opps Noor, if this is your first account, I suggest you spend a bit of time doing content work before getting involved in back-room processes like deletion. Sojourner in the earth (talk) 21:31, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Procedural keep The nom is asked to expand their reason; not liking the article is not enough for a deletion rationale.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 21:37, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Nominator isn't clear about how the article [doesn't] meet Wikipedia's requirements and hasn't given a valid reason. The article is notable enough. --Harobouri • 🎢  • 🏗️ (he/him)  21:46, 4 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.