Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/01 811 8055


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete by WP:SNOW. Bearian 00:27, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

01 811 8055

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Is an old phone number for the BBC notable ? Hammer1980 ·talk 19:59, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not a phone book, especially not for defunct phone numbers. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 20:00, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Multi-Coloured Swap Shop. What am I saying?!  Delete. Lugnuts 20:19, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, a telephone number is not notable and I agree Wikipedia is not a phone book EJF 21:09, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete apart from WP:NOT concerns defunct phone numbers are not worth articles. Hut 8.5 21:28, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. --Oscarthecat 21:32, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Obviously not notable.  Malinaccier (talk • contribs) 21:38, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete,Problems with the phone number was making the newspapers at the time, but the Multi-Coloured Swap Shop article adequately covers it. MortimerCat 23:48, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Multi-Coloured Swap Shop gives a good description, we shouldn't have an article on a phone number. Maser  ( Talk! ) 07:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per WP:NOT, although strangely I can't think of how precisely I would apply WP:NOT in this case.-h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 11:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.