Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1% rule


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete as nonsense. --Ezeu 16:30, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

1% rule
Original research, no sources, self-referential.  r speer  / ɹəəds ɹ  22:02, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This article doesn't even make any sense. -- Kicking222 22:38, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, while there are apparently many references to a "one percent rule" out there, none of them seem to correspond to this definition. It just seems to be a common label for just about anything.  Really bad example used here as well; doesn't seem to match the proposed definition.  Kuru   talk  22:50, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Original research abakharev 23:20, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research, and as fuzzy version of a topic that is much better dealt with under Pareto principle and Pareto distribution. Dpbsmith (talk) 00:53, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per annoying de-prodder nom. &mdash; Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 01:00, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete no citations probably made-up. Cedars 06:32, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Though I created this I can offer no defence of it. I thought is had a wider use but cannot find any. Lumos3 09:35, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. Not sure if this needs an article, but I researched this (gasp) and the "1% rule" has been written about quite a bit in articles and blogs recently. Once such example is here, which is a good one because it cites the book where the research originated, The Wealth of Networks (amazon.com).  The premise is that in any online contributor-based community (such as Wikipedia), 1% of the userbase makes the majority of contributions.  Aguerriero  ( talk ) 20:05, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Pareto principle, which this seems to be an more extreme (less believable) version of. Maybe we could merge some content and mention the 1% rule in Pareto principle? -GTBacchus(talk) 01:45, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - patent nonsense relating to Wikipedia. Stevage 16:27, 23 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.