Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1. What is JMS ? Why JMS ?


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:32, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

1. What is JMS ? Why JMS ?

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A subjective essay, whose topic is already adequately described at Java Message Service. ← Spidern  →  18:40, 25 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete exam answer —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 18:58, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as per nom. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:40, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete with 2. What are JMS Models ? too. &lowast; \ / (⁂) 20:27, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete both of these. Subjective essays do not belong in an encyclopaedia. Firestorm  Talk 20:47, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete both as OR. Drmies (talk) 22:59, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete As copyvio of http://www.nyu.edu/classes/jcf/g22.3033/handouts/g22_3033_h87.htm Lets  drink Tea 23:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't see the copyvio; maybe a couple of sentences. I'm deleting the speedy tag, and deleting the two offending sentences. But to be safe, I'm adding the  tag and giving the link on the talk page. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 00:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I didn't see the copyvio either -- Dank55 barely beat me to declining the speedy.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  00:07, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I just chose a random sentence and googled it and got an exact match so I tagged it as Copyvio Lets  drink Tea 01:38, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Why are we even discussing this?  This is not an encyclopaedia article and already covered per nom. -- Escape Orbit  (Talk) 00:10, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, it has been brought to AFD, so we have to discuss it. However, it could probably not have survived a prod. Nonetheless, it has been brought here for a deletion discussion. Firestorm  Talk 04:39, 26 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Subject already adequately covered elsewhere. -0 Mgm|(talk) 09:58, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete This reads like someone's homework. Wikipedia is not for posting essays. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 21:58, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Languid Delete. Meh. –  7 4   23:47, 27 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.