Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10,000ft


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:25, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

10,000ft

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Do not adhere to Encyclopedia standards. Spin Off company is not notable. Article is mere writing from Marketing or PR Gimmick. Purpose is to promote their product. Corporate Spam. Awards are in finalist. No-depth and repeated coverage on notable media is found. Light2021 (talk) 18:54, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  18:55, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  18:55, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  18:56, 15 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- unremarkable private company. The content belongs on the company web site, as in:
 * "Since then, the product has grown to support over 1,000 businesses worldwide. In 2015, 10,000 ft introduced 10,000 ft Insights!" (no citation offered).
 * Wikipedia is not a free means of promotion or a replacement for a company's sales brochure. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:29, 15 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Has never actually won a first place award. The references are notices document wnd place, finalist, etc. No sources or evidence for notability  DGG ( talk ) 20:16, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete – Highly promotional as others have stated. Most of the information in this article is cited to the company's website, a press release, and several product advertisements. There is one article from a notable author written in 2012 before the product was released, but that was in anticipation that the product would become significant within its targeted industry. No evidence ever emerged that this ever happened. --GoneIn60 (talk) 10:44, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete promotional wording, no evidence of notability in independent sources. Attempting to use Wikipedia as a platform for promotion. Steve Quinn (talk) 01:49, 20 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.