Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/100% Capri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 07:48, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

100% Capri

 * – ( View AfD View log  Capri Stats )

A quick runover with a chainsaw will remove the stench of spam, but I see nothing in the sources to suggest notability, just PR_generated mush.TheLongTone (talk) 15:55, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Keep I suggest you WP:Assume good faith. I am certainly not a PR op or spammer nor do I have any interest in writing articles here which excessively praise people and include gushing prose and use non reliable sources. I would never have created this if I didn't believe it was within guidelines. Sources like Haute Living, Miami Herald, Fodor's, Palm Beacher Magazine meet both WP:RS and WP:GNG. Bal Harbor Shops is also the most lucrative shopping centre in the entire United States. This brand has stores in many of the world's wealthiest locations, it's clearly notable in its field. I have been careful in writing here to write content which is neutral and encyclopedic and avoid incorporating "fluff" as I can see that companies and CEO articles are unfairly discriminated against here because people seem to assume that anybody writing articles on companies are spammers. This is better quality and sourced better than a sizeable percentage of our current articles. I intend on fully expanding our poor quality article on Capri too, but I need mutual support from other editors here to be motivated to write here, not this hostile approach. Universal Encyclopedian2 (talk) 19:20, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:35, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:35, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:35, 13 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete due lack of notability and also assuming good faith, but they aren't mutually exclusive. Someone can have all the good intent in the world but their article still might not meet the notability guidelines. That's life. Get over it and make articles about actually notable companies next time instead of complaining or putting it on other people like your doing toward the nominator. It's not on them your sources don't qualify or that your prose smells like advertising. It's not a big deal. Learn from it and write better articles next time. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:17, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Sources are local promos, routine mentions in trade magazines, or press releases. I can't find anything more significant when I search. Glendoremus (talk) 23:34, 17 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.