Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/100% Hits: The Best of 2006 (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 17:26, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

100% Hits: The Best of 2006
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Don't be fooled by the links currently used; there is not much coverage in reliable secondary sources, therefore failing WP:GNG. Snuggums (talk / edits) 13:25, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  13:45, 17 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:NALBUMS #3. StAnselm (talk) 17:34, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Certifications alone are not enough to make an album notable; WP:NALBUMS states that there also has to be significantly coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:24, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * So why does WP:NALBUMS exist? How is it different from WP:GNG? StAnselm (talk) 19:19, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * The requirements of WP:NALBUMS are—in addition to significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources—there must be a confirmed title, track list, and official release date. In other words, it is WP:GNG with certain verified details. Snuggums</b> (<b style="color:#454545">talk</b> / <b style="color:#454545">edits</b>) 23:22, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * We must be looking at different guidelines. The one I saw set the notability threshhold at gold certification or higher. StAnselm (talk) 04:54, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:46, 18 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. Meets WP:NALBUMS if it was certified platinum. Doctorhawkes (talk) 06:12, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Not automatically; the very first sentence of WP:NALBUMS states "All articles on albums, singles or other recordings must meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". It fails this requirement and therefore fails notability criteria. <b style="color:#454545">Snuggums</b> (<b style="color:#454545">talk</b> / <b style="color:#454545">edits</b>) 13:20, 19 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep charting album that received platinum certification - satisfies WP:NALBUMS. Dan arndt (talk) 14:13, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
 * See above; charts alone ARE NOT ENOUGH to satisfy WP:NALBUMS. <b style="color:#454545">Snuggums</b> (<b style="color:#454545">talk</b> / <b style="color:#454545">edits</b>) 14:42, 19 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep the coverage is significant: charting on national charts and platinum certification, which are verified by reliable and independent sources. Furthermore, "a confirmed title, track list, and official release date" has now been provided.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 03:44, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * All the references currently used only give brief mentions; not enough coverage. Furthermore, charts and certifications by themselves do not automatically make an album notable. <b style="color:#454545">Snuggums</b> (<b style="color:#454545">talk</b> / <b style="color:#454545">edits</b>) 03:57, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment The Australian Charts Portal reference is an entire page almost solely on the album. This is hardly a "brief mention": as indicated above it gives confirmed title, track list and official release date. It also provides catalogue numbers, labels and track times.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 05:15, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Simoly naming all of an album's song in list form doesn't really count for much. It doesn't really discuss the album compared to things like album reviews, which would be more useful if they could be found. <b style="color:#454545">Snuggums</b> (<b style="color:#454545">talk</b> / <b style="color:#454545">edits</b>) 12:52, 20 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.