Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/100% Music


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:14, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

100% Music

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

I declined this as a speedy because it makes some claim to notability, though I don't think it passes either WP:MUSIC or WP:CORP. Black Kite (t) (c) 18:48, 8 November 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 19:01, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I nominated it for speedy, as it did not seem notable, and the article was created by and is maintained by a single purpose account. Pure spam. Ohconfucius  ¡digame! 01:37, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.