Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/100+ Great Games


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   deleted by User:Jimfbleak. Closing as moot. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:48, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

100+ Great Games

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

No indication as to why listing 100 games would be notable enough for an encyclopedia. In fact it seems to be one persons personal opinion on what they think are 100 great games. I did nominate this via WP:PROD before but the deletion template was removed with no explanation as to why the article is notable. 5 albert square (talk) 07:11, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:CSD. -- Jayron  32  07:16, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 07:36, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete agreed WP:CSD. Aeonx (talk) 09:22, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Actually reads like one of the many CD-ROM compilations of basic or terrible public domain computer games you find for $5 in a cheap software section at a superstore (or with adapted board games like Parcheesi, Connect Four or Yahtzee generically named and having elements genericalized or changed colors); easily meets A7 nonetheless.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 10:14, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete It probably can be speedied based on no showing of importance, as incidcated by Jayron above. Basically, this is from a newcomer who isn't familiar with what can be put in a Wikipedia article, and seems to be his or her own list of video games.  Mandsford 15:17, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Can't work out if it's OR or, as MrsChimpf says, a compliation box. Either way, there's no indication of importance, and it's borderline nonsense.-- K orr u ski Talk 15:34, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.