Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1001 technologies

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --Ryan Delaney talk 18:22, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

1001 technologies
It's a list of (I suppose) 1001... um... things. No wiki, no hope of NPOV, coherence, relevance, continued existence. Delete. Lomn 15:30:20, 2005-08-11 (UTC)
 * Delete. I have a policy to delete lists that group tea, viagra, donuts, and the hydrogen bomb, together.   &rarr;ub&#949;r n&#949;mo &rarr;  lóquï 16:43, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * I missed the donuts! BJAODN "Donut hole technology" Lomn 18:06:36, 2005-08-11 (UTC)


 * Delete this and the line added to the Technology page. &mdash; RJH 16:45, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Odd. Short of a very good explanation... delete. Flowerparty  talk 18:08, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete...odd. Cake, light, and Coca-Cola aren't technologies in any meaning of the word. Hopelessly NPOV. --WolFox 18:49, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. What is this list about? How is "Volleyball" separate from "Volleyball (the game)" and why is that on a list with "Circumnavigation of globe". ManoaChild 03:35, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete this useless page. ike9898 09:46, August 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Looks like it'll get deleted - It is awfull in some respects but does promote thought - Glad I got to it before then . . . Can't do Supplemental pages? Ross 200805


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.