Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1002 (number)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was redirected (again). Melchoir 06:41, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

1002 (number)
De-prodded by User:Kmweber, who is on a de-prodding-without-giving-a-reason spree. This is numbercruft, pure and simple. The number has zero unique or interesting properties. Delete. -- Kicking222 22:47, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to 1000 (number) - this seems to be the pattern for most other numbers in that ballpark (1003 (number), 1004 (number), etc).  Kuru   talk  23:09, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * This is a clear case for a redirect, which shouldn't require the AfD process. I suggest closing early and redirecting.  r speer  / ɹəəds ɹ  23:12, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 *  Redirect  to 1000 (number) and speedy close. jgp 01:49, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * And since the redirect is done, I change my vote to Speedy Close. jgp 16:50, 22 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Redirect as above, although I would rather it weren't there at all.... &mdash; Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 01:56, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect/Done I did the redirect. If you all want to close this out and remove the afd tag.... jbolden1517Talk  01:57, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect as above. I wish people wouldn't redirect before others have finished looking it over. :-/ &mdash; RJH 16:33, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * The article is still there. History is intact . jbolden1517Talk  16:41, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Exactly. Since merges and redirects can be done by anyone and preserve the page history, such discussion belongs on the article's talk page, not AfD. And with that, I think this should be closed now... jgp 16:50, 22 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy Close article has been redirected, old copy available in page history. (~Kylu) 207.145.133.34 21:40, 22 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.