Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10 Foot Ganja Plant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:56, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

10 Foot Ganja Plant

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NBAND or WP:GNG. See Talk:10 Foot Ganja Plant for more discussion on its notability. Haven't charted in a chart that meets notability criteria. Boleyn (talk) 22:21, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:32, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:32, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:49, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Can those arguing to keep the article please present links to coverage here (or add them to the article)?
 * Delete: per nom, and per talk page discussion. (Alas, that the editor who led that discussion didn't file an AfD ... a year ago.)   Ravenswing     23:57, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets criterion Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable). Geschichte (talk) 11:24, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, per GNG. Under WP:BAND, a band "may be notable if they meet at least one of the following criteria." (emphasis added). Ultimately, I can't find anything establishing notability and I can't say I agree that being signed to ROIR makes a band noteworthy. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia  talk  12:50, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Multiple albums have charted in the top 15 on the Billboard Reggae Albums Chart, Allmusic has a bio and 8 album reviews, and there are print magazine review in GBooks from The Beat and The Wire. --Michig (talk) 15:00, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as has significant coverage outlined above in The Beat, The Wire and AllMusic as well as charting so passes WP:GNG in my view and should be included, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:54, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:11, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep They seem to have reviews in enough sources to be notable. Plus, they have multiple albums that charted on Billboard. Although someone might argue that it's a sub chart and therefore not valid, but I'm not the one to do it. Even if I was, they still have the multiple album reviews to pass WP:NBAND anyway. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:07, 28 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.