Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10 Lives


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Saliva (band). (non-admin closure) Northern Escapee (talk) 07:23, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

10 Lives

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fan-centric article about an album that does not likely meet WP:NALBUM, was previously a redirect to the band's discography. I'm bringing this here because User:Onel5969 blanked it recently only for it to be restored. FalconK (talk) 05:45, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 05:45, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 05:45, 18 January 2021 (UTC)


 *  Keep - Article is well sourced with several reviews. Assuming that the article can not be kept, it should be merged into Saliva (band). --Jax 0677 (talk) 02:34, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I see only directory listings and press releases, far short of the significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that would be required for the sourcing to indicate notability. FalconK (talk) 02:48, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Thats an especially bad WP:VAGUEWAVE argument. Outside of the short Blabbermouth article, these are all very obscure rock blogs. A stub with seven obscure blogs is most certainly not "well-sourced". Sergecross73   msg me  12:09, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Saliva (band). Fails WP:NALBUM. Sources used in this article are not reliable, let alone of high quality. I'd also recommend a protection over the redirect so that the article could not be restored, HĐ (talk) 11:13, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect - I couldn't find any reliable sourcing outside of the Blabbermouth source already in the article, and even that one is a pretty brief announcement that doesn't say much about the album. Sergecross73   msg me  12:09, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the band. Album does not pass WP:NALBUM. And not nearly enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:54, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: Sources in the article seem to be reliable (except for AllMusic, which doesn't have a review) and they talk about the album and indicate its track listing as well. That said, the article is good enough to pass WP:NALBUM. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Which ones? And how are they reliable? There's no prior consensus exists on any except Blabbermouth. A quick look isn't promising. "National Rock Review" has no professional credentials. "Side Stage" has no precessional credentials. "Cryptic Rock" is actively listed at WP:NOTRSMUSIC. Sergecross73   msg me  03:07, 21 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Saliva (band). Album reviews (except AllMusic) are not reliable, and the article currently doesn't pass WP:NALBUM. Ashley  yoursmile!  08:08, 26 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.