Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10 Men (magazine)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 04:13, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

10 Men (magazine)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability. There are currently 4 sources in the article. One is an interview with Sophia Neophitou, the editor in chief, and mentions the magazine in-passing. The next two are from the magazine's own website and the last is a cover with a little bit of info (publisher, paper size, and such). Does not meet WP:GNG, hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 15:35, 17 April 2016 (UTC) Thank you for you comments, please understand I am new to the Wiki community and I am still learning the ropes. Ana Edge (talk) 18:02, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable enough Daniel Kenneth (talk) 16:04, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * The argument for would be, if this is not acceptable in terms of notability. Then may I ask why its sister magazine (10 Magazine UK) is allowed? As I see not a lot of difference between the two?
 * Comment Looks like that one isn't really notable either. In any case, this is not a valid argument in this discussion, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. --Randykitty (talk) 18:15, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:37, 17 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as nothing yet suggesting a better notably improved article, unfortunately. SwisterTwister   talk  06:13, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:13, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:48, 23 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - No in-depth coverage from reliable, independent sources. Fails WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:48, 24 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.