Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10 September (political group)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 00:43, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

10 September (political group)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Is this even a real Political group?  Jay Jay Talk to me 02:00, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 12 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep The nominator asks a very valid question. "Is this even a real political group?" In response, I would ask, does the nominator read Turkish? Has the nominator engaged in a detailed search of online Turkish language sources that would allow the nominator to offer an informed opinion? I favor a relatively low threshold for acceptance of the notability of political organizations and parties worldwide; left, right and center. This encyclopedia ought to cover such groups comprehensively, unless it can be demonstrated that the articles are hoaxes, or are about truly insignificant groups. So I recommend keeping this article at least until fundamental questions are answered by someone conversant in Turkish.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  04:49, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:07, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 15:35, 26 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete While Cullen328 may personally want low thresholds for notability on Wikipedia, we must at least use Wikipedia's rules for notability, and those at this time indicate this is not a notable topic. It is not up to us to demonstrate that this is a "truly insignificant" group, it is up to the article to demonstrate notability. It fails to do that, and if nobody bothers to fix it, assuming it svsncan be fixed, then it deserves to be deleted. If we don't know it's not a hoax, then it needs to go away immediately, not wait around for a Turkish speaker. He's got WP:V/[[WP:GNG/WP:OR completely backwards from how they actually work. DreamGuy (talk) 02:45, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep: Nothing that is notable "deserves" to be deleted, even if people can't lift a finger to actually edit articles.  We do know its not a hoax..  The world gets the wikipedia it deserves.--Milowent • hasspoken  04:10, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not seeing any sourcing or any evidence of notability. --DAJF (talk) 13:49, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.