Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10 Years of Chaos and Confusion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Hypocrisy (band). J04n(talk page) 13:13, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

10 Years of Chaos and Confusion

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails notability criteria for recordings WP:NALBUM. No significant coverage and this album has not made the charts. Steve Quinn (talk) 04:16, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:56, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:34, 21 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Hypocrisy (band) § Compilation albums as a valid search term. Source searches are only providing passing mentions (e.g., ). North America1000 16:08, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: This should probably be the final relist before a no consensus is called. KaisaL (talk) 00:35, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I approve the deletion of this article! Like yea. Why would Wikipedia be a complete encyclopedia? PET (talk) 17:55, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as the Allmusic review referenced in the article is a reliable source.Atlantic306 (talk) 13:05, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KaisaL (talk) 00:35, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment as the nom - I can agree to a redirect as recommended above - the info seems good - it just doesn't reach the notability threshold per WP:NM and WP:NALBUM - as I have stated and as North America 1000 has stated (see above). Steve Quinn (talk) 03:03, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and then Redirect as the 1 Keep vote is suggesting we can simply keep it altogether....simply because 1 source, but that's still simply not enough. SwisterTwister   talk  07:40, 9 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.