Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10 longest duration films of Bollywood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:22, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

10 longest duration films of Bollywood

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unnecessary list. NawlinWiki 12:39, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Malcolmxl5 12:45, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete listcruft. feydey 12:57, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete- It is listcruft and unnecessary.  Neranei  T / C  13:20, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This is the essence of listcruft, and "X Longest" lists are not notable, nor encyclopedic. --SunStar Net talk 14:47, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This article is clearly listcruft in content. -- S iva1979 Talk to me 15:37, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as guy who marked article for speedy delete. Complete trivia and listcruft. Useight 17:25, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete listcruft and unnecessary. --Onceonthisisland 22:25, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of the above--JForget 00:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete amusing but worthless. Bigdaddy1981 02:59, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Include on the List of the 10 most quickly deleted lists in Wikipedia. It's so misguided, it has 11 films listed. Clarityfiend 16:06, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT, WP:TRIVIA and WP:LC. Carlosguitar 17:28, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of the above. Bearian 20:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.