Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/110mb.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete as spam. Daniel Case 04:55, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

110mb.com

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

non notable web hosting. looks more like a advertisement anyway Viewplane 05:51, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - doesn't seem notable, and yes, sounds like an advertisement. But then, Rapidshare, Megaupload, Sendspace and even, Comparison of one-click hosters should be deleted too. —  *H  ¡ρρ¡ ¡ρρ¡   06:17, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not a lot in notability, and the article reads like a critique and "how to deal with them". -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 06:51, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Very advert like. I get worried whenever .com is in the title of an article Rackabello 07:28, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Advertising/text dump. --Fang Aili talk 19:47, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete especially the last half of it due to blatant advert.--JForget 22:47, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable--a quick Google search turns up very little independent secondary coverage. RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  05:28, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete appears to be spam for a company with no obvious/discoverable notability. Nuttah68 16:55, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete It has been tidied up a little, but it is still essentially an extract of the company's own advertising - the remainder being conjecture and guesswork. User:prole 22:26, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.