Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/112 Katong


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:02, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

112 Katong

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Doesn't appear to qualify under WP:CORP. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;   &copy;  12:58, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:40, 14 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. I agree with the nominator; just another small shopping mall.  I found no reliable sources and notability is neither asserted nor present.  Ubelowme (talk) 15:09, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Additional reliable sources added since nomination. ♠♠ BanëJ ♠♠ (Talk) 07:45, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Additional reliable sources added since nomination. Passes WP:CORP now --Xaiver0510 (talk) 04:13, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:GNG as reliable sources have discussed the mall. Till 14:01, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - new sources are merely WP:ROUTINE coverage of a WP:RUNOFTHEMILL shopping mall that, alas, is not notable. - The Bushranger One ping only 18:36, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep I think the coverage in reliable sources in the article is sufficient to establish notability per the general notability guideline. Davewild (talk) 20:04, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   19:08, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MacMedtalk stalk 19:26, 22 June 2012 (UTC)


 * ? It's been relisted twice on the same day. Till 03:35, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note to closer Something went wrong with the above attempts to relist the discussion, it is not currently transcluded in a daily log. I am adding it now. Monty  845  14:30, 10 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep – The topic passes WP:GNG. Examples:, , , , , . Northamerica1000(talk) 00:54, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.