Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1188 AM


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 16:16, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

1188 AM

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability Polyamorph (talk) 20:53, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete while stand alone lists for radio stations based on frequency are often kept, a list of a single item where additional items are unlikely to be added in the near future should be deleted. Winner 42 Talk to me!  21:43, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 02:21, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 02:21, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 02:21, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep per argument at Articles for deletion/585 AM. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 05:34, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just a list of questionably notable radio stations. Not enough for WP:LISTN. Ajf773 (talk) 10:42, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 05:54, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is a list article that serves to help direct people to notable topics, not a thing that has to be "notable" in its own right. A consensus was established long ago that because people don't always know the correct name of an individual radio station they might be looking for, lists to help differentiate radio stations by frequency are warranted as a wikinavigation aid — and the fact that only one station has been listed here so far is not in and of itself proof that this frequency should be excepted from that consensus, because as noted above other stations do exist on this frequency and just haven't been added here yet. Eastmain has it exactly right: because North American radio only uses the AM frequencies that are multiples of ten, while much of the rest of the world does not follow that limitation and also uses the frequencies between the tens, it would represent systemic bias to suggest that an AM radio frequency should only have a navigation list if it has North American radio stations on it. Bearcat (talk) 15:14, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy withdraw this AfD per the arguments above. Note there was no intentional bias on my part, it was purely a notability argument, but as there is precedent for keeping such articles I withdraw my nomination. Polyamorph (talk) 16:44, 18 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.