Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/11 March 2004 Madrid train bombings/Atelier


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Userfied, with original page deleted. The discussion seems to be showing that as a good outcome, with the contributors accepting the stance. The page seems to have been created in the article namespace through a misunderstanding of the way we work rather than any other reason. The page can now be found at User:Larean01/Atelier 1, if the text hasn't been copied across properly and you need access to the original, don't hesitate to ask. Hiding Talk 17:32, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

11 March 2004 Madrid train bombings/Atelier
It is the same thing as 11 March 2004 Madrid train bombings except it has a weird /atelier after it. There is also directions saying that red text should be used so that signatures don't appear on the page. This goes against WP:OWN T REX speak 16:18, 15 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Redundancy.-- Hús  ö  nd  16:23, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Userfy to Southofwatford's sandbox, then delete.-- Hús  ö  nd  16:35, 15 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete as CSD G6. Just seems to be the result of some people taking a strange approach to editing an article. -- I sl a y So lo mo n  |  t a l k  16:28, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Southofwatford 16:29, 15 October 2006 (UTC) This is a discussion version of the Madrid train bombings article that is being used to try and resolve disputes over the content of the main article. If you don't want us to do it this way then please suggest a better way. The colours issue arises because it permits each user involved in the discussion to use a different colour for their comments. We could also use signatures, but does it really matter given that this is not intended to be anything except a working version?
 * Comment You should try using your sandbox for this purpose instead.-- Hús  ö  nd  16:32, 15 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment Since this page seems to be a work-in-progress, I'll withdraw my vote until someone more learned than myself can shed some light on the situation. -- I sl a y So lo mo n  |  t a l k  16:36, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Userfy per Husond. Work-in-progress or not, good idea or not, it shouldn't be in the main namespace in this form. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 21:47, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Randroide 09:20, 17 October 2006 (UTC) Hello everybody. I am the user who had the "weird idea" and who took the "strange approach" of using a colour code for the proposals made by different users. All the other users are "innocent".

I never had the intention (not even the awareness) of going against WP:OWN. My idea was to make easier and more fluid the communication in a extremely disputed topic. Of course that, once a consensus is (hopefully) reached, colour codes are to be elimitated and the Atelier page deleted. We are not asking "ownership" of "our" contributions, only using a colour code to make communication easier.


 * If, even under these conditions, the format of the page is unacceptable, I beg indications about Wikipedia guidelines about SOP in this kind of hotly disputed atelier pages. We have no discussion page (the page is already an offshot of a discussion page) and lenghty discussions inside the disputed text would make the Atelier very difficult to work with.


 * If the page is to be deleted, I ask, please, to be warned with some advance, to copy (without colours, of course) the improvements made to the text so far.

I copied the contents of the page to User:Larean01/Atelier 1. You can delete the original atelier. Please tell us if this "usification" is acceptable.Randroide 16:20, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.