Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/120k

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 01:16, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)

120k
Not encyclopedic. And far, far too long. Probably a copyvio from a publication. &mdash; P Ingerson (talk) 22:01, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Massive unwikified spamvertisement. Unfortunately, obvious spam like this is not speediable. A &#1080; D &#1103; 01D  TALK  EMAIL  23:40, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Let's self-help ourselves to a better future by deleting this article. humblefool&reg; 23:49, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * An unrivalled opportunity! You can improve your Wikipedia within minutes, in your spare time and from the comfort of your own home!  No advance payment required!  Just click here.  Uncle G 00:59, 2005 Jun 21 (UTC)
 * Delete ad. Pity Google doesn't seem to find a copyvio or we could mute it in the meantime. -Splash 01:26, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, and in the meantime I am going to be bold and edit out the contact information as inappropriate content. DS1953 02:34, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not at all encyclopedic content, also badly written, I couldn't even stand to read it long enough to find if there was any material worth salvaging. Peter Grey 02:38, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete advertising. JamesBurns 06:55, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.