Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1234 Shille Hodi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio 08:12, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

1234 Shille Hodi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non-notable song. Indiaglitz is a bad source. This song is not relevant in any manner. TamilMirchi (talk) 19:26, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 19:26, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 19:26, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 19:26, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 19:26, 2 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - Note that more sources are found under the song's native language title "೧೨೩೪ ಶಿಳ್ಳೆ ಹೊಡಿ", but unfortunately it's more of the same, with basic press releases, lyric sites, and streaming entries in that language. Furthermore, most of those are dedicated to the movie that the song comes from. The English sources currently used in the article are mostly about the movie as well, plus unreliable celebrity gossip about who is in the video. The song has no reliable coverage in its own right. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 02:41, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Anjani Putra: Barely found anything about the song. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 06:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not satisfy WP:NSONG. -- Ab207 (talk) 18:33, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete the song doesn't seem notable enough to pass WP:NSONG. Even under the "native" title of it. Normally I'd go with a redirect, but I don't think it's necessary in this case. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:06, 10 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.