Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/128 Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:46, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

128 Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per various source searches, does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. North America1000 01:09, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:09, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:09, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:09, 19 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Result #1 on google. FertilityWizard (talk) 01:12, 19 October 2017 (UTC) — FertilityWizard (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment – Hi : check out WP:LOTSOFGHITS. North America1000 01:14, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete -- no indications of notability or significance. Searches return nothing usable. Basically, promo spam. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:02, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) &#xF0F6;  15:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep As there are two acts on the label (Claude Hay & <The Sleep-Ins) that have already met the notability criteria for a Wiki, it seems right that the label itself would as well. User:Peckynor (talk) 08:09, 31 October 2017 (UTC) — Peckynor (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 23:20, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:CORPDEPTH as nom said. References 1 and 3 (out of only 3) are not directly talking about the label. I can't find anything reliable in my little search. The SPA accounts above that want it kept have done nothing to improve the article even by single word. &thinsp;&mdash; Ammarpad (talk) 14:43, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Fails WP:CORPDEPTH.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.