Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/12 Inches of Sin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  So Why  06:45, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

12 Inches of Sin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't know why it has a paid tag, but it worries me, I PRODded it, as the references seemed flimsy and contrived (although oddly well formatted for a new user who has no prior work). the prod was removed so I am nominating this for deletion under WP:GNG as it does not, IMHO pass the criteria. &Alpha; Guy into Books &trade; &sect; ( Message ) -  08:56, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment. If the references are flimsy and contrived, that's an article quality issue and not a reason for deletion unless sufficient coverage doesn't exist. There's plenty of coverage around, e.g., , , , , , , , , so it appears notable enough. --Michig (talk) 09:17, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 11:32, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 11:32, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 11:32, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * To respond to the nominator's query, see Sockpuppet investigations/Capeman7/Archive. This page is likely to be a commissioned article. MER-C 10:06, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment. Was directed to look at the proposed deletion and inquire if it is being targeted because of the mission of the organization. This page serves as a reference point for many academic, art and nonprofit organizations. Information is not up-to-date, yet relevant links. Reviewed discussion links and do not understand references to support deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8801:3106:a700:8425:dbb0:ea82:d7c2 (talk) 03:13, September 27, 2017‎

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:28, 30 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Significant coverage in Las Vegas Review-Journal, Las Vegas Weekly, Vice.com and Nevada Public Radio as found by and these are all WP:RS. The paid/commissioned concerns can be addressed separately as WP:DINC. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 08:50, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades of Godric On leave 09:02, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:31, 10 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep the sources are decent: Huffpo, NPR, LV Review Journal... There is enough writing about this show in reliable publicaitons to meet notability. I trimmed some promotional writing and bad refs.96.127.242.251 (talk) 08:59, 12 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.