Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1311 Knopfia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000. Davewild (talk) 07:21, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

1311 Knopfia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Should be deleted or redirected to List of minor planets: 1001–2000 per NASTRO. Consensus is for those under 2000 to be discussed and not unilaterally redirected or prodded. Boleyn (talk) 07:00, 5 May 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 07:00, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:35, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:18, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak Redirect per WP:DWMP: two photometry studies found, but all they contain are data points with no commentary. Praemonitus (talk) 15:34, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect for reasons listed above. It won't hurt to have this as a redirect in the article namespace redirecting to List of minor planets: 1001-2000.-- Shibboleth ink (♔ ♕) 16:13, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect. I don't see anything beyond what's already mentioned above that would justify keeping this one. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:10, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
 * "Redirect and merge' anything useful. Best to keep the redirect so article not recreated after deletion.   Montanabw (talk)  19:55, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect per WP:NASTRO (WP:NASTCRIT) No significant coverage found on this object itself. Everything on google scholar is a paper listing several asteroids (explicitly mentioned in NASTCRIT #3 as not meeting notability) &#8213; Padenton &#124;&#9993;  20:08, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.