Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1351 Uzbekistania


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 04:00, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

1351 Uzbekistania

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG, but as a low-numbered asteroid, consensus is that it is well-discussed rather than redirected unilaterally. I think it should be deleted; or (preferably) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001–2000 per NASTRO's guidelines. Boleyn (talk) 08:41, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:11, 12 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect per WP:DWMP. Insufficient sources. There is a photometry study that I can't access; the rest are position reports. Praemonitus (talk) 17:41, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Being part of one six-object lightcurve study is not enough. (It's also part of an 820-asteroid study  but I don't think that's sufficiently selective to confer notability.) —David Eppstein (talk) 20:13, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: Based on IRAS observations it is a relatively large 65km asteroid. This concept of notability is no worse then other largely arbitrary interpretations used to define notability for many main-belt asteroids. -- Kheider (talk) 14:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * One of the astronomy notability criteria deals with size, and its threshold is "The object is, or has been, visible to the naked eye." &#8213; Padenton &#124;&#9993;  20:18, 17 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect per WP:NASTRO (WP:NASTCRIT) No significant coverage found on this object itself. Everything on google scholar is a paper listing several asteroids (explicitly mentioned in NASTCRIT #3 as not meeting notability) &#8213; Padenton &#124;&#9993;  20:18, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.