Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1355 Magoeba


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator (non-admin closure).  ƬheStrike  Σagle   11:08, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

1355 Magoeba

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Should be deleted or redirected per NASTRO to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn (talk) 21:12, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 17 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep: there appear to be sufficient sources available to establish notability. Praemonitus (talk) 15:49, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Included in five lightcurve studies   , an unusually high number, the most recent of which states that there are still unresolved ambiguities in its rotational period which has led to the suggestion that it's a binary . Also included in a spectrascopic study , a polarimetric study , and a resonance simulation , and briefly mentioned as having an unusual orbit in another article . It all adds up to plenty of attention, and I think a pass of WP:NASTRO. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:20, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Withdraw nomination per above - I've been confirmed. Boleyn (talk) 07:41, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.