Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1372 Haremari


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 18:57, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

1372 Haremari

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 19:24, 11 April 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 19:24, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Nothing worth merging, but possibly worth a redirect to List of minor planets: 1001–2000 as is usual procedure if asteroid is found to be non-notable. Boleyn (talk) 19:27, 11 April 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 19:27, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 12 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. I found an old paper entirely about its orbit and a newer one implying that it has an unusual type of orbit (Trojan with Ceres). I think that may be enough to distinguish it from the others and pass WP:NASTRO. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:10, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep, I'm not sure I understand, but the existence of papers solely on this particular rock would indicate to me it's not your ordinary asteroid. Lankiveil (speak to me) 07:01, 19 April 2015 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.