Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1383 Limburgia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Davewild (talk) 18:18, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

1383 Limburgia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Should be deleted or redirected per NASTRO to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn (talk) 21:07, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:46, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. This was one of the 34 bodies in the Texas Minor Planet Project which analyzed their orbits carefully "to map irregularities of the fundamental system of equatorial coordinates" . Additionally it is part of two photometric studies   and is used as an example in a paper about orbit determination . I think that's enough attention to pass WP:NASTRO. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:08, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 08:02, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep- I have to AGF on David Eppstein's sources, but I would say that level of coverage would be enough to meet our notability guidelines, and certainly more than the typical minor planets that have recently been redirected. Rlendog (talk) 18:03, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.