Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1384 Kniertje


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 15:48, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

1384 Kniertje

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Should be deleted or redirected to List of minor planets: 1001–2000 per NASTRO. Consensus is for those under 2000 to be discussed and not unilaterally redirected or prodded. Boleyn (talk) 06:59, 5 May 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 06:59, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:35, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Weak keep. Included in three lightcurve studies on small sets of asteroids   and mentioned in several other larger-scale studies. I think that may be enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:09, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Borderline Keep: based on sources. Praemonitus (talk) 22:17, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:00, 13 May 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:44, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: It has an fairly unusual albedo of 0.3. -- Kheider (talk) 09:54, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.