Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/13 (Armstrong novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Ya  sh  !   08:05, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

13 (Armstrong novel)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable book. No claim to notability provided in article; no references, either. References to substantiate notability aren't forthcoming, so I don't think this meets WP:NBOOK. Mikeblas (talk) 15:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment this is the final (13th, even) vol of a series, Women of the Otherworld: if this is deleted then for consistency the other 12 should be looked at - the series article has no sources. The author article, Kelley Armstrong, cites a couple of her books, including number 7 in this series, as being NYTimes best-sellers but is fairly thin on sourcing too. Pam  D  16:49, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment. I found two reviews and an article. Technically this is enough for it to pass NBOOK, but I'd prefer that there be more to justify inclusion since this is fairly light. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:22, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - no proper reason for a deletion. As Tokyogirl79 said: there's enough coverage for it to be kept. --Fixuture (talk) 18:55, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:15, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK ie. 2 or more reviews from reliable sources. Also, i know library holdings aren't used for notability but WorldCat has it held in over 900 libraries, pretty good for the final book in such a large series.  Coolabahapple (talk) 14:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as references have now been added by Tokyo Girl and WP:BASIC is met.Atlantic306 (talk) 02:40, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:18, 25 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.