Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1416 Renauxa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 20:41, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

1416 Renauxa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. I think it should be deleted or (preferably) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001-2000. Boleyn (talk) 19:10, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:48, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Uncertain: It shows up in several papers, but some of them I couldn't access because they're behind a pay wall. Praemonitus (talk) 15:42, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. I don't see a lot of literature on this body but what there is makes it seem somewhat unusual. It was one of the first ten identified K-type asteroids . It is also mentioned several times in a mineralogical analysis of 30 asteroids in the Eos family, more prominently than many other objects in the study (approximately 1/2 page of text+figures specifically about this one) . —David Eppstein (talk) 20:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 21:15, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep for reasons mentioned above. -- Kheider (talk) 17:50, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.