Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/142 MP Company US Army


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America1000 08:58, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

142 MP Company US Army

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested WP:Prod. Company level formations are generally not notable, see WikiProject Military history/Notability guide. MKFI (talk) 08:49, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:52, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:52, 9 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Not generally notable, no significant coverage, fails soldier and the berginning of each section on the WP page matches the leading text from military.com (I could not get the full text to display this morning in spite of being a member).-- Georgia Army Vet  Contribs  Talk  12:36, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't know what your problem is; it loaded for me. I would be tempted to merge it with the 94th Military Police Battalion, but that unit doesn't have an article. Hawkeye7 (talk) 12:52, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: it could be mentioned briefly in a parent article if reliable sources exist, but ultimately it doesn't appear to be a valid stand alone topic, IMO. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 07:53, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete-- unsourced original research on non notable company-sized unit. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:31, 17 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.